1. After applying to a homeschooled, online education program, I was selected for an interview. A series of questions consisted in the final stage.
“What will you do to be sure diversity is your top priority?”, was the question I answered for them to say, “Thank you. But we will be considering other candidates”.
My reply was nothing more than “Diversity is not a priority, but true understanding of the subject was THE priority”
2. After running for BOE in my county, I will be unable to do so again. The vile attacks on myself, my family and those who displayed my signs were dangerous with no accountability held on those offenders.
Please know, you are not alone. Not now, nor over history. We are kindred.
Please also consider why "the elites" had Socrates, the Greek Philosopher, drink the Hemlock to his death. They claimed he had "offended the gods". Simply put, they had a very high opinion of themselves and Socrates speaking truth offended THEM. (If it were not for his student, Plato, we might know none of his teachings.)
The questions remain: 1) Why do Americans and Westerners in-fight? 2) Why do Western elite leaders ignore their constituents (and "roll over" elections)? 3) Who benefits from this? Founded ideas available upon request.
That's whack. I suggest lying your way in and then bait and switch. Your trying to win a game of checkers against a cheater by sticking to the rules, but there is no umpire to step in and disqualify them for cheating. Sometimes you gotta let the wookie win, because he will get out of your way without ripping off your arms. And you thought a robotic hand was expensive for a foster kid from a desert planet with dead caregiver's, two arms would be insurmountable. So let the wookie think it wins, then shoot it in the back and sell it's pelt to a wig maker.
Universities have become hedge funds with campuses attached. Not only should federal funds be withheld from offending institutions, but foreign sourced endowments need to be tightly regulated and restricted.
A little slave boy character of Mark Twain was asked by the son of his master; "where do you suppose a man gets his ideals?" The little slave boy replied; "I suppose it depends on who gives him his corn pone."
In Spanish, some say; "Quien paga, manda".
Others: "The way to a man's heart, is through his stomach."
When did these Marxists professors start to get "educated," and where did their professors come from? This tells me that there have been communist ideologists in our education system for many years now. Have we sat by, and watched as we have had to pay for this to happen? The frog in the eventually boiling water comes to mind here. I agree that Hillsdale would be a great college. I would also recommend Prager U.
Like the 1930s, Socialism is on the rise and more active than ever. One political party has Sanders and AOC beating that drum now. The situation is deeper.
China seems to have used the greed of our government and business leaders to influence them toward harm of the West. I am open to others, but I speak from personal experiences. Always open to share. I pay the price regularly. This is what patriotism requires.
As others have noted, Harvard's 3 bullet response didn't address any one of the items listed in the directive from the Trump administration, other than ditching DEI, which pervades basically everything and is a large source of supplemental income from the DOE.
If actual leadership existed at Harvard, they'd say "Thanks!", and stop taking any federal funds, because they can easily afford it, and continue doing what they think is best. But they won't and can't do that - why, exactly? This is Harvard's clever way of saying we will continue to take what's not ours and we don't need, and you'll like it, because we are Education, and behind that shield all things are permissible.
I agree absolutely with what you have written. But given my concerns right now -- my wife's health (she's house-bound), my health, my grandchildren, the state of world politics and economy -- a whole raft of things that concern me on a daily basis, I just cannot devote mental bandwidth to a case-by-case study of individual rankings of universities that I and people near me will not be attending. I know what you're offering is important. It is just not front and center for my concerns right now. Perhaps it should be, but the urgency of the concerns I listed above don't leave me the energy to pursue this particular line of study at this time.
This is short-sighted of me, but my immediate concerns just take all my focus at this time and, I anticipate, will do so for the rest of my days.
I wish you well with this effort. I just don't have the energy to add it to my portfolio now.
That is precisely the plan my friend. If you can't blind them with brilliance baffle them with bullishit. The whole democrat republican thing is just an extension of the construct. That's why intelligent people switch occasionally as what is right gets represented. It's not an accident, it's the system we use to make people think that they have a vote, and therefore anything the government does is effectively our own fault. It's how they avoid being beheaded. They know that they can tap our complacency by keeping too many balls in the air for the majority of citizens to get outraged over the same thing and actually affect change that isn't in alignment with the empires decisions. They use a simple system of breaking objectives down into components, and then dividing up the components with one set that seems unrelated to each other going to the right,lets say, increasing the strength of the empires ability to police people and opress them, as well as, increase corporate power by eroding rights as a consumer.
The two seem unrelated. No one goes to jail over bad terms of service with the cable company Right?
Other components go to the left, lets say, getting everyone completely reliant on the government and unable to stay of their teat, and...how about, minimizing the strength of our connection to other authorities, because the empire is your only Master right?
Then you put some components into the public sphere, something that neither side seems to care about intrinsically, but that gets picked up as non partisan because the people demand it. Let's say, public safety and political corruption.
So none of these 6 concepts seem to have anything to do with each other right? And both sides gave wildly different concepts on how to approach each issue. I submit that the combination are actually parts of a bigger equation.
They like to get us to demand to be oppressed, thing like the second the police movement, they acted like that was a real thing by pissing off a bunch of black people right? And presented it as if we were going to some how just abolish the criminal justice system? Nonsense, the movement was never intended to succeed, it's purpose was to create chaos and exaggerate the need for policing, so that the right would say " hey this is chaos! We want an armed cop at every Street corner! Look at all this crime going on! We gotta get more cops and really have them clamp down on these people"
* Goal achieved: get citizens to demand more extensive and severe enforcement of the empires edicts.
And guess what, we DEMANDED they do it. So the empire won't be criticized for it. The right will.
The left says," hey everyone has a right to food no matter what! Everyone has a right to medical care! It's a service to the poor. Why do you, who has so much, seek to deprive those less fortunate of the most basic necessities for life? How can a poor child ever become productive if they starve first? Or are crippled by treatable conditions? "
There is no persuasive argument against it. No person can advocate the starving or neglect of children or of old women or of the man who was injured trying to do right but crippled by a freak accident. So they provide services and benefits to the people, so much so that the economy adjusts to it. You can't bring your own dollar store box of bandaids to the Doctors office, you can't haggle with the prescription pad. You can accept what they give you, or you can pay 6000 a month. Which one but them can do, and so your reliant on their choices about what care you receive, what food you may eat. Because any extra slack in your budget you would have had to give you the power to shop around, instead is eaten up by other markets, if you make 1600 Dollars a month you get 300 bucks in food stamps a month. If you make 1700 dollars you get 200 stamps if you make 1800 you get no stamps, if you make 22 hundred you no longer qualify for Medicare, and there is a law that says you must be insured. You have no choice, care to guess how much it to cost to get a Medicare equivalent insurance plan privately? About 400 bucks a month. Can you guess what the fine is for not having insurance all year? You can bet your ass it's the same price as buying the insurance policy would have cost you. So regardless to if you make 1600 a month, or you make 2200 a month, you will be getting 1900 dollars worth of services and goods from our society. Making that extra work your doing effectively pointless, it keeps the middle class from being able to grow. Keeps you poor, because poor people have to beg and take what they are given. And that's what they like to see their subjects doing. We get to blame the lack of productivity and the extra taxes we pay on the left, it's not the empires fault, it's the fault of the left. And of the poor, those leeches living off of our hard work. Living the good life in their cramped apartments, working their manual Labor jobs. Taking all my money I make from day trading stocks or getting a bunch of leases to do the labor while I keep them in line.
We homeschooled our daughter in the '90s - after helping to work out the theory at Antioch in the '60s, where I was an ed major. I don't believe in diversity - only in weirdness.
A couple of things come to mind when reading this article: 1) if nothing else, Marxists know how to play the long game and started infiltrating schools in the late sixties and have successfully taken over the bulk of the process, aided by unions, and 2) student loans, especially after the government takeover under Obama, have no accountability for the value gained by taking out a loan. The majority of these “degrees” are virtually useless and students would have been better off simply going into the job market immediately after HS. The vast majority of jobs in today’s market do not require a college degree, certainly not one in gender studies or Taylor Swift. Compounding the travesty is that universities do not teach critical thinking any longer, they simply indoctrinate. I do note that one commenter mentioned the influx of foreign money into our universities which is in fact nothing more than propaganda by foreign actors and needs to be regulated.
I agree with your second point completely, Clyde. But the date on your first point, I would suggest, is late. The infection of our university system began earlier than the sixties. At some point, I would like to write at greater length about this, but for now I would suggest those who are not familiar with the Frankfurt School should familiarize themselves who and what they were. Briefly they are Neo-Marxist intellectuals that arrived in the US just after WWII to initiate what they called the March through the Insitutions-- Media, Entertainment and the Academy--to change Western society. To an unfortunate degree, they succeeded.
I have heard of the Frankfurt School, but thought this was indeed late sixties. I guess I stand corrected and will go back and look this up! Thanks for the info, and keep up the great work!
Perfectly explained with excellent ideas offered to help families select a college with good, balanced curriculums. Our youngest grandson is graduating from high school this May. He just turned 17. At 14, he was interviewed by an honor college and accepted into their neuroscience program with a full scholarship. Because he has been encouraged to be pro active in making decisions that directly affect him, he thought it over, thanked the college, and said he wanted to stay and finish high school for the academics, the sports urogram (he’s a swimmer), the socialization, and the volunteer opportunities. As a result, he found his true purpose after spending many volunteer hours at Bush Wildlife Sanctuary. He’s planning on becoming a veterinarian. He applied to 4 colleges, was interviewed and received letters of acceptance from each of them. He chose a college in his home state of Florida because it is one of the few colleges that offers a comprehensive pre veterinary program. He also chose this public college because it has a good reputation for making sure its students are privy to excellent programs with good professors and because he has a full scholarship because of his good work in high school. He has already had 2 interviews with the man who will be the Dean of Clemson’s brand new veterinarian degree program in 2026. When he graduates with his undergraduate degree, he will have good credentials that will help him get into a veterinary program. There’s only about 15 schools that offer this science based course program. Helping students to use critical thinking skills and making important decisions for themselves is a key to help kids meet with success.
The saying "getting the most bang for your buck" has evolved to "we're entitled to your buck whether you get any bang out of it or not." A revolution was fought to rid us of 'Taxation Without Representation.' Schools of Higher Education? Where a nominee for and eventual US Supreme Court Justice could not answer the question asked of her to describe "What is a Woman?" Where violently attacking and discriminating against Jewish students is permitted, yet Islamic extremism that supports the brutality and murderous actions by Hamas and their equally guilty and involved so called "Palestinians" on Oct. 07, 2023 is ignored on most US college campuses today. Put it to a "legitimate vote" of the American Taxpayer. Higher Education is a nothing more than Wokeism on Steroids. Indoctrination Camps with Anti-American, Socialistic leanings.
As always, excellent writing that makes the points clearly. Thank you.
Teach people "how to think" not "what to think". This is crucial. Truth and its exposition has diminished massively in American Society (please ask some young people to "make change" or do very simple arithmetic) - and this seems more so in the Ivy Leagues, where we are pre-programmed to select for leadership (and therefore, an exploitable danger exists.)
I live walking distance from Harvard. I returned to this area in 2016 after a period in Tucson from 2007. I can share my findings on request. These are important.
One thing we noticed, as we tried to re-engage with our community, was the vast and massively sweeping changes to what had become very prevalent partisan political behaviors (not factual, but "water-carrying" for ideology with no room for discussion). It was like old eastern European novels and essays. Along the way, we learned about Harvard's Radcliffe Institute and the content they regularly provide. Please go look at it. People are free to do as they choose, provided they do not harm others.
Lastly, I sat in the University of Arizona's Industry Advisory Board. (Partisan Politics were also rising wickedly in Tucson at that time - dividing Americans, as any foreign adversary would enjoy.) One area where opined was on "university expansion". It was driven by (leftist) government. I warned that these subsidies were unsustainable and would leave some universities in financial peril (it came to be true). In addition, when scaled, it seemed clear that this would also "dump" and excess of college educated people into an economy that could not absorb them and the (subsidized) debt would become defaulted (it also came to be true). People became angry with my opinion. It's human nature. "Sucks to be right" sometimes, right?
It is important now, more than ever, that Americans and Westerners find ways and reasons to "come together" rather than fall for the in-fighting that seems to be stoked by foreign adversaries through the use of their "soft power" (like contributions and alignment of financial and ideological interests (like Socialism)) that seems to be "controlling" our "elite" leadership. Have a look and please consider. Feel free to debate.
The issue neither you nor anyone else is addressing is the massive amount of Muslim - Arab money that has been flooding all of these schools thus having a major impact on what is happening. As always, follow the money.
There are two points this article brings to mind.
1. After applying to a homeschooled, online education program, I was selected for an interview. A series of questions consisted in the final stage.
“What will you do to be sure diversity is your top priority?”, was the question I answered for them to say, “Thank you. But we will be considering other candidates”.
My reply was nothing more than “Diversity is not a priority, but true understanding of the subject was THE priority”
2. After running for BOE in my county, I will be unable to do so again. The vile attacks on myself, my family and those who displayed my signs were dangerous with no accountability held on those offenders.
Please know, you are not alone. Not now, nor over history. We are kindred.
Please also consider why "the elites" had Socrates, the Greek Philosopher, drink the Hemlock to his death. They claimed he had "offended the gods". Simply put, they had a very high opinion of themselves and Socrates speaking truth offended THEM. (If it were not for his student, Plato, we might know none of his teachings.)
The questions remain: 1) Why do Americans and Westerners in-fight? 2) Why do Western elite leaders ignore their constituents (and "roll over" elections)? 3) Who benefits from this? Founded ideas available upon request.
That's whack. I suggest lying your way in and then bait and switch. Your trying to win a game of checkers against a cheater by sticking to the rules, but there is no umpire to step in and disqualify them for cheating. Sometimes you gotta let the wookie win, because he will get out of your way without ripping off your arms. And you thought a robotic hand was expensive for a foster kid from a desert planet with dead caregiver's, two arms would be insurmountable. So let the wookie think it wins, then shoot it in the back and sell it's pelt to a wig maker.
“What will you do to be sure diversity is your top priority?”
“Diversity is a fact not a value."
Joe Soucheray
Universities have become hedge funds with campuses attached. Not only should federal funds be withheld from offending institutions, but foreign sourced endowments need to be tightly regulated and restricted.
A little slave boy character of Mark Twain was asked by the son of his master; "where do you suppose a man gets his ideals?" The little slave boy replied; "I suppose it depends on who gives him his corn pone."
In Spanish, some say; "Quien paga, manda".
Others: "The way to a man's heart, is through his stomach."
When did these Marxists professors start to get "educated," and where did their professors come from? This tells me that there have been communist ideologists in our education system for many years now. Have we sat by, and watched as we have had to pay for this to happen? The frog in the eventually boiling water comes to mind here. I agree that Hillsdale would be a great college. I would also recommend Prager U.
Like the 1930s, Socialism is on the rise and more active than ever. One political party has Sanders and AOC beating that drum now. The situation is deeper.
China seems to have used the greed of our government and business leaders to influence them toward harm of the West. I am open to others, but I speak from personal experiences. Always open to share. I pay the price regularly. This is what patriotism requires.
More great information, Roger!
As others have noted, Harvard's 3 bullet response didn't address any one of the items listed in the directive from the Trump administration, other than ditching DEI, which pervades basically everything and is a large source of supplemental income from the DOE.
If actual leadership existed at Harvard, they'd say "Thanks!", and stop taking any federal funds, because they can easily afford it, and continue doing what they think is best. But they won't and can't do that - why, exactly? This is Harvard's clever way of saying we will continue to take what's not ours and we don't need, and you'll like it, because we are Education, and behind that shield all things are permissible.
I agree absolutely with what you have written. But given my concerns right now -- my wife's health (she's house-bound), my health, my grandchildren, the state of world politics and economy -- a whole raft of things that concern me on a daily basis, I just cannot devote mental bandwidth to a case-by-case study of individual rankings of universities that I and people near me will not be attending. I know what you're offering is important. It is just not front and center for my concerns right now. Perhaps it should be, but the urgency of the concerns I listed above don't leave me the energy to pursue this particular line of study at this time.
This is short-sighted of me, but my immediate concerns just take all my focus at this time and, I anticipate, will do so for the rest of my days.
I wish you well with this effort. I just don't have the energy to add it to my portfolio now.
That is precisely the plan my friend. If you can't blind them with brilliance baffle them with bullishit. The whole democrat republican thing is just an extension of the construct. That's why intelligent people switch occasionally as what is right gets represented. It's not an accident, it's the system we use to make people think that they have a vote, and therefore anything the government does is effectively our own fault. It's how they avoid being beheaded. They know that they can tap our complacency by keeping too many balls in the air for the majority of citizens to get outraged over the same thing and actually affect change that isn't in alignment with the empires decisions. They use a simple system of breaking objectives down into components, and then dividing up the components with one set that seems unrelated to each other going to the right,lets say, increasing the strength of the empires ability to police people and opress them, as well as, increase corporate power by eroding rights as a consumer.
The two seem unrelated. No one goes to jail over bad terms of service with the cable company Right?
Other components go to the left, lets say, getting everyone completely reliant on the government and unable to stay of their teat, and...how about, minimizing the strength of our connection to other authorities, because the empire is your only Master right?
Then you put some components into the public sphere, something that neither side seems to care about intrinsically, but that gets picked up as non partisan because the people demand it. Let's say, public safety and political corruption.
So none of these 6 concepts seem to have anything to do with each other right? And both sides gave wildly different concepts on how to approach each issue. I submit that the combination are actually parts of a bigger equation.
They like to get us to demand to be oppressed, thing like the second the police movement, they acted like that was a real thing by pissing off a bunch of black people right? And presented it as if we were going to some how just abolish the criminal justice system? Nonsense, the movement was never intended to succeed, it's purpose was to create chaos and exaggerate the need for policing, so that the right would say " hey this is chaos! We want an armed cop at every Street corner! Look at all this crime going on! We gotta get more cops and really have them clamp down on these people"
* Goal achieved: get citizens to demand more extensive and severe enforcement of the empires edicts.
And guess what, we DEMANDED they do it. So the empire won't be criticized for it. The right will.
The left says," hey everyone has a right to food no matter what! Everyone has a right to medical care! It's a service to the poor. Why do you, who has so much, seek to deprive those less fortunate of the most basic necessities for life? How can a poor child ever become productive if they starve first? Or are crippled by treatable conditions? "
There is no persuasive argument against it. No person can advocate the starving or neglect of children or of old women or of the man who was injured trying to do right but crippled by a freak accident. So they provide services and benefits to the people, so much so that the economy adjusts to it. You can't bring your own dollar store box of bandaids to the Doctors office, you can't haggle with the prescription pad. You can accept what they give you, or you can pay 6000 a month. Which one but them can do, and so your reliant on their choices about what care you receive, what food you may eat. Because any extra slack in your budget you would have had to give you the power to shop around, instead is eaten up by other markets, if you make 1600 Dollars a month you get 300 bucks in food stamps a month. If you make 1700 dollars you get 200 stamps if you make 1800 you get no stamps, if you make 22 hundred you no longer qualify for Medicare, and there is a law that says you must be insured. You have no choice, care to guess how much it to cost to get a Medicare equivalent insurance plan privately? About 400 bucks a month. Can you guess what the fine is for not having insurance all year? You can bet your ass it's the same price as buying the insurance policy would have cost you. So regardless to if you make 1600 a month, or you make 2200 a month, you will be getting 1900 dollars worth of services and goods from our society. Making that extra work your doing effectively pointless, it keeps the middle class from being able to grow. Keeps you poor, because poor people have to beg and take what they are given. And that's what they like to see their subjects doing. We get to blame the lack of productivity and the extra taxes we pay on the left, it's not the empires fault, it's the fault of the left. And of the poor, those leeches living off of our hard work. Living the good life in their cramped apartments, working their manual Labor jobs. Taking all my money I make from day trading stocks or getting a bunch of leases to do the labor while I keep them in line.
We homeschooled our daughter in the '90s - after helping to work out the theory at Antioch in the '60s, where I was an ed major. I don't believe in diversity - only in weirdness.
A couple of things come to mind when reading this article: 1) if nothing else, Marxists know how to play the long game and started infiltrating schools in the late sixties and have successfully taken over the bulk of the process, aided by unions, and 2) student loans, especially after the government takeover under Obama, have no accountability for the value gained by taking out a loan. The majority of these “degrees” are virtually useless and students would have been better off simply going into the job market immediately after HS. The vast majority of jobs in today’s market do not require a college degree, certainly not one in gender studies or Taylor Swift. Compounding the travesty is that universities do not teach critical thinking any longer, they simply indoctrinate. I do note that one commenter mentioned the influx of foreign money into our universities which is in fact nothing more than propaganda by foreign actors and needs to be regulated.
I agree with your second point completely, Clyde. But the date on your first point, I would suggest, is late. The infection of our university system began earlier than the sixties. At some point, I would like to write at greater length about this, but for now I would suggest those who are not familiar with the Frankfurt School should familiarize themselves who and what they were. Briefly they are Neo-Marxist intellectuals that arrived in the US just after WWII to initiate what they called the March through the Insitutions-- Media, Entertainment and the Academy--to change Western society. To an unfortunate degree, they succeeded.
I have heard of the Frankfurt School, but thought this was indeed late sixties. I guess I stand corrected and will go back and look this up! Thanks for the info, and keep up the great work!
Perfectly explained with excellent ideas offered to help families select a college with good, balanced curriculums. Our youngest grandson is graduating from high school this May. He just turned 17. At 14, he was interviewed by an honor college and accepted into their neuroscience program with a full scholarship. Because he has been encouraged to be pro active in making decisions that directly affect him, he thought it over, thanked the college, and said he wanted to stay and finish high school for the academics, the sports urogram (he’s a swimmer), the socialization, and the volunteer opportunities. As a result, he found his true purpose after spending many volunteer hours at Bush Wildlife Sanctuary. He’s planning on becoming a veterinarian. He applied to 4 colleges, was interviewed and received letters of acceptance from each of them. He chose a college in his home state of Florida because it is one of the few colleges that offers a comprehensive pre veterinary program. He also chose this public college because it has a good reputation for making sure its students are privy to excellent programs with good professors and because he has a full scholarship because of his good work in high school. He has already had 2 interviews with the man who will be the Dean of Clemson’s brand new veterinarian degree program in 2026. When he graduates with his undergraduate degree, he will have good credentials that will help him get into a veterinary program. There’s only about 15 schools that offer this science based course program. Helping students to use critical thinking skills and making important decisions for themselves is a key to help kids meet with success.
What a great story. You and your husband deserve hearty congratulations as parents.
The saying "getting the most bang for your buck" has evolved to "we're entitled to your buck whether you get any bang out of it or not." A revolution was fought to rid us of 'Taxation Without Representation.' Schools of Higher Education? Where a nominee for and eventual US Supreme Court Justice could not answer the question asked of her to describe "What is a Woman?" Where violently attacking and discriminating against Jewish students is permitted, yet Islamic extremism that supports the brutality and murderous actions by Hamas and their equally guilty and involved so called "Palestinians" on Oct. 07, 2023 is ignored on most US college campuses today. Put it to a "legitimate vote" of the American Taxpayer. Higher Education is a nothing more than Wokeism on Steroids. Indoctrination Camps with Anti-American, Socialistic leanings.
As always, excellent writing that makes the points clearly. Thank you.
Teach people "how to think" not "what to think". This is crucial. Truth and its exposition has diminished massively in American Society (please ask some young people to "make change" or do very simple arithmetic) - and this seems more so in the Ivy Leagues, where we are pre-programmed to select for leadership (and therefore, an exploitable danger exists.)
I live walking distance from Harvard. I returned to this area in 2016 after a period in Tucson from 2007. I can share my findings on request. These are important.
One thing we noticed, as we tried to re-engage with our community, was the vast and massively sweeping changes to what had become very prevalent partisan political behaviors (not factual, but "water-carrying" for ideology with no room for discussion). It was like old eastern European novels and essays. Along the way, we learned about Harvard's Radcliffe Institute and the content they regularly provide. Please go look at it. People are free to do as they choose, provided they do not harm others.
Lastly, I sat in the University of Arizona's Industry Advisory Board. (Partisan Politics were also rising wickedly in Tucson at that time - dividing Americans, as any foreign adversary would enjoy.) One area where opined was on "university expansion". It was driven by (leftist) government. I warned that these subsidies were unsustainable and would leave some universities in financial peril (it came to be true). In addition, when scaled, it seemed clear that this would also "dump" and excess of college educated people into an economy that could not absorb them and the (subsidized) debt would become defaulted (it also came to be true). People became angry with my opinion. It's human nature. "Sucks to be right" sometimes, right?
It is important now, more than ever, that Americans and Westerners find ways and reasons to "come together" rather than fall for the in-fighting that seems to be stoked by foreign adversaries through the use of their "soft power" (like contributions and alignment of financial and ideological interests (like Socialism)) that seems to be "controlling" our "elite" leadership. Have a look and please consider. Feel free to debate.
The issue neither you nor anyone else is addressing is the massive amount of Muslim - Arab money that has been flooding all of these schools thus having a major impact on what is happening. As always, follow the money.
Autodidacts of the world unite - home school college.